Journal of Epidemiology (Nov 2022)

Assessing the Relationship Between High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein and Kidney Function Employing Mendelian Randomization in the Japanese Community-based J-MICC Study

  • Ryosuke Fujii,
  • Asahi Hishida,
  • Takeshi Nishiyama,
  • Masahiro Nakatochi,
  • Keitaro Matsuo,
  • Hidemi Ito,
  • Yuichiro Nishida,
  • Chisato Shimanoe,
  • Yasuyuki Nakamura,
  • Tanvir Chowdhury Turin,
  • Sadao Suzuki,
  • Miki Watanabe,
  • Rie Ibusuki,
  • Toshiro Takezaki,
  • Haruo Mikami,
  • Yohko Nakamura,
  • Hiroaki Ikezaki,
  • Masayuki Murata,
  • Kiyonori Kuriki,
  • Nagato Kuriyama,
  • Daisuke Matsui,
  • Kokichi Arisawa,
  • Sakurako Katsuura-Kamano,
  • Mineko Tsukamoto,
  • Takashi Tamura,
  • Yoko Kubo,
  • Takaaki Kondo,
  • Yukihide Momozawa,
  • Michiaki Kubo,
  • Kenji Takeuchi,
  • Kenji Wakai

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20200540
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 32, no. 11
pp. 483 – 488

Abstract

Read online

Background: Inflammation is thought to be a risk factor for kidney disease. However, whether inflammatory status is either a cause or an outcome of chronic kidney disease remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the causal relationship between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches. Methods: A total of 10,521 participants of the Japan Multi-institutional Collaborative Cohort Study was analyzed in this study. We used two-sample MR approaches (the inverse-variance weighted (IVW), the weighted median (WM), and the MR-Egger method) to estimate the effect of genetically determined hs-CRP on kidney function. We selected four and three hs-CRP associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as two instrumental variables (IV): IVCRP and IVAsian, based on SNPs previously identified in European and Asian populations. IVCRP and IVAsian explained 3.4% and 3.9% of the variation in hs-CRP, respectively. Results: Using the IVCRP, genetically determined hs-CRP was not significantly associated with eGFR in the IVW and the WM methods (estimate per 1 unit increase in ln(hs-CRP), 0.000; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.019 to 0.020 and −0.003; 95% CI, −0.019 to 0.014, respectively). For IVAsian, we found similar results using the IVW and the WM methods (estimate, 0.005; 95% CI, −0.020 to 0.010 and −0.004; 95% CI, −0.020 to 0.012, respectively). The MR-Egger method also showed no causal relationships between hs-CRP and eGFR (IVCRP: −0.008; 95% CI, −0.058 to 0.042; IVAsian: 0.001; 95% CI, −0.036 to 0.036). Conclusion: Our two-sample MR analyses with different IVs did not support a causal effect of hs-CRP on eGFR.

Keywords