Pulmonary Circulation (Apr 2024)

Exploratory analysis of the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters for the assessment of right ventricular function and right ventricular–pulmonary artery coupling

  • Hideki Shima,
  • Ichizo Tsujino,
  • Junichi Nakamura,
  • Toshitaka Nakaya,
  • Ayako Sugimoto,
  • Takahiro Sato,
  • Taku Watanabe,
  • Hiroshi Ohira,
  • Masaru Suzuki,
  • Satonori Tsuneta,
  • Yasuyuki Chiba,
  • Michito Murayama,
  • Isao Yokota,
  • Satoshi Konno

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12368
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Echocardiography is a widely used modality for the assessment of right ventricular (RV) function; however, few studies have comprehensively compared the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters using invasively obtained reference values. Therefore, this exploratory study aimed to compare the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters of RV function and RV–pulmonary artery (PA) coupling. We calculated four indices of RV function (end‐systolic elastance [Ees] for systolic function [contractility], τ for relaxation, and β and end‐diastolic elastance [Eed] for stiffness), and an index of RV–PA coupling (Ees/arterial elastance [Ea]), using pressure catheterization, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and a single‐beat method. We then compared the correlations of RV indices with echocardiographic parameters. In 63 participants (54 with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and nine without PH), Ees and τ correlated with several echocardiographic parameters, such as RV diameter and area, but the correlations were moderate (|correlation coefficients (ρ)| 0.65. In addition, RVFW‐LS/eSPAP yielded high sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.75) for detecting reduced Ees/Ea. The present study indicated a limited accuracy of echocardiographic parameters in assessing RV systolic and diastolic function. In contrast to RV function, they showed high accuracy for assessing RV–PA coupling, with RVFW‐LS/eSPAP exhibiting the highest accuracy.

Keywords