Life (Jan 2022)

Organ Donation after Damage Control Strategy in Trauma Patients: Experience from First Level Trauma Center in Italy

  • Michele Altomare,
  • Shir Sara Bekhor,
  • Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi,
  • Marco Sacchi,
  • Federica Renzi,
  • Andrea Spota,
  • Roberto Bini,
  • Federico Ambrogi,
  • Federico Pozzi,
  • Arturo Chieregato,
  • Osvaldo Chiara,
  • Stefania Cimbanassi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life12020214
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
p. 214

Abstract

Read online

Background: Organ donation (OD) remains the only therapeutic option for end-stage disease in some cases. Unfortunately, the gap between donors and recipients is still substantial. Trauma patients represent a potential yet underestimated pool of organ donors. In this article, we present our data on OD after damage control strategy (DCS). Materials and Methods: A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted through a complete revision of data of consecutive adult trauma patients (>18 years old) who underwent OD after DCS between January 2018 and May 2021. Four subgroups were created [Liver (Li), Lungs (Lu), Heart (H), Kidneys (K)] to compare variables between those who donated the organ of interest and those who did not. Results: Thirty-six patients underwent OD after DCS. Six patients (16.7%) were excluded: 2(5.6%) for missing data about admission; 4(11.1%) didn’t receive DCS. Mean ISS was 47.2 (SD ± 17.4). Number of donated organs was 113 with an organs/patient ratio of 3.8. The functional response rate was 91.2%. Ten organs (8.8%) had primary nonfunction after transplantation: 2/15 hearts (13.3%), 1/28 livers (3.6%), 4/53 kidneys (7.5%) and 3/5 pancreases (60%). No lung primary nonfunction were registered. Complete results of subgroup analysis are reported in supplementary materials. Conclusion: Organ donation should be considered a possible outcome in any trauma patient. Aggressive damage control strategy doesn’t affect the functional response rate of transplanted organs.

Keywords