Assessment of 2% vs 3% Peripheral Hypertonic Sodium Chloride Administration and Its Impact on Safe and Timely Treatment

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Evaluate if peripheral administration of 3% hypertonic saline (HTS) provides timely treatment with a rate of infusion-related adverse events at or below what is reported in the literature. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted in a large academic medical center in New York City. Eligible patients were inpatients receiving either 2% or 3% HTS for severe hyponatremia, elevated intracranial pressure, or cerebral edema. The primary outcome was incidence of infusion-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints included achievement of appropriate sodium correction, incidence of over-correction, length of time from ordering to medication administration, and incidence of osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). Main Results A total of 199 patients were included in analysis (85 in the 3% HTS group and 114 in the 2% HTS group). No difference was found between groups for rate of infusion related adverse events or incidence of sodium overcorrection groups (0 vs 1 [0.9%]; p = 0.39). Significantly more patients in the 3% HTS group received intermittent administration (p < 0.001), whereas more patients in the 2% HTS group received a continuous infusion (p < 0.001). There were no reports of ODS in either group. No difference in length of time to administration was found between groups. Conclusion Our study, one of the largest to evaluate peripheral administration of 3% HTS, found that it is not associated with an increase in infusion related adverse events or sodium overcorrection versus 2% HTS. Peripheral administration should be recommended to provide timely treatment for patients requiring HTS.

Keywords

• Hypertonic solutions
• Hyponatremia
• Administration
• Intravenous
• Osmolar concentration
• Intracranial pressure