Knee Surgery & Related Research (Sep 2024)
Tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase is an alternative synovial biomarker for diagnosis of septic arthritis in knee joint
Abstract
Abstract Background To evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase (WRS) for the diagnosis of septic arthritis of the knee joint and to determine whether it is a reliable and sensitive synovial biomarker for discriminating septic arthritis from other types of arthritis. Methods Patients joint effusions for which septic arthritis was suspected were prospectively recruited between January 2019 and September 2020. A total of 9 patients had septic arthritis, 6 had acute gout attack, 1 had an acute flare of chronic rheumatic arthritis, and 46 had pseudogout or reactive arthropathy. Traditional inflammatory markers were measured, and their diagnostic abilities were compared. Neutrophil count, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, WRS, and human neutrophil α-defensin levels were assessed in the synovial fluids. Demographic parameters and biomarkers with a P < 0.05 in differentiating septic from nonseptic arthritis were included in a multivariable model. A multivariable logistic regression with a stepwise selection was performed to build the final combined model. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to establish optimal thresholds for the diagnosis of septic arthritis of the knee joint, and the area under the curve was calculated to determine the overall accuracy of these tests compared with patients with nonseptic inflammatory arthritis. Results Patients with septic arthritis were more likely to display higher serum WBC and CRP levels, synovial neutrophil counts, and levels of two synovial biomarkers, including WRS and α-defensin. WRS showed the highest specificity (87.5%) and sensitivity (83.3%) with α-defensin among the three synovial biomarkers. Conclusions Synovial fluid WRS is a relevant biomarker in discriminating septic arthritis from other inflammatory arthritis and should be tested in an independent cohort. Level of evidence: prospective observational study, III.
Keywords