Development and validation of competing risk nomograms for predicting cancer‑specific mortality in non-metastatic patients with non‑muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer

Abstract

Abstract We aimed to assess the cumulative incidences of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in non-metastatic patients with non‑muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer (NMIUBC) and establish competing risk nomograms to predict CSM. Patient data was sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, as well as the electronic medical record system in our institution to form the external validation cohort. Sub-distribution proportional hazards model was utilized to determine independent risk factors influencing CSM in non-metastatic NMIUBC patients. Competitive risk nomograms were constructed to predict 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in all patients group, TURBT group and cystectomy group, respectively. The discrimination and accuracy of the model were validated through the concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and a risk stratification system was employed to evaluate the clinical utility of the model. Race, age, marital status, surgery in other sites, tumor size, histological type, histological grade, T stage and N stage were identified as independent risk factors to predict CSS in all patients group. The C-index for 3-year CSS was 0.771, 0.770 and 0.846 in the training, testing and external validation sets, respectively. The ROC curves showed well discrimination and the calibration plots were well fitted and consistent. Moreover, DCA demonstrated well clinical effectiveness. Altogether, the competing risk nomogram displayed excellent discrimination and accuracy for predicting CSS in non-metastatic NMIUBC patients, which can be applied in clinical practice to help tailor treatment plans and make clinical decisions.

Keywords

• Nomogram
• Bladder cancer
• Competing risk model
• Cumulative incidence curves
• SEER