Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care (Jan 2020)

Assessment of protective relationship of G6PD and other lifestyle factors with Malaria: A case-control study of medical professionals from a teaching medical institute, Gujarat

  • Niraj Pandit,
  • Tejaskumar Kalaria,
  • Jitendra D Lakhani,
  • Jasmin Jasani

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_947_20
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 11
pp. 5638 – 5645

Abstract

Read online

Background: There remains equivocal evidence in terms of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and malaria occurrence. A case-control study was performed to assess protective relationship of G6PD and other lifestyle factors with malaria. Methods: One-hundred twenty six medical professionals were randomly selected from a tertiary care clinical institute. Along with demographic and lifestyle details, subjects were interviewed about their history of occurrence of malaria at all in previous 10 years. Their hematological, biochemical, and metabolic profile was assessed clinically as well as by investigations. The analysis was carried out with two groups: (1) those who were subjected with malaria at least once in past 10 years (Malaria Ever Group); (2) those who never encountered malaria (Malaria Never Group). Results: Out of 126, 65 subjects were in Malaria Ever Group and 61were in Malaria Never Group. There was no difference in lifestyle measures, hematological, and biochemical parameters. Mean G6PD levels were found similar in both the groups. Of 61 subjects in “malaria-never” group, 1 had deficient (1.1 unit/gm of Hb), 9 had low normal (between 2.5 and 10 units/gm of Hb), 48 had normal (10.1–20.5 units/gm of Hb), and 3 had higher than normal (>20.5 units/gm of Hb) G6PD levels. In comparison, 65 participants from “malaria ever” group, none was deficient, 6 had low normal, 58 had normal, and none had higher than normal G6PD levels. HPLC-based hemoglobin analysis showed significant higher number of participants in “malaria-never” group having altered hemoglobin. 12 participants had increased hemoglobin A2 levels, of which 10 were in “Malaria Occurrence Never” group; of them 6 could be diagnosed having hemoglobinopathy of specified variety. 3 of these 10 participants of “malaria-never” group had low G6PD levels also. Conclusion: Malaria Protection Hypothesis was not found to be true as per our findings, but there were subtle hints that G6PD protection with or without change in hemoglobin alteration maybe operable.

Keywords