BMC Infectious Diseases (Feb 2019)

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: comparison with scrub typhus and clinical diagnostic prediction

  • Sang-Won Park,
  • Chang-Seop Lee,
  • Jeong-Han Kim,
  • In-Gyu Bae,
  • Chisook Moon,
  • Yee Gyung Kwak,
  • Baek-Nam Kim,
  • Jae Hoon Lee,
  • Seong Yeol Ryu,
  • Hee-Chang Jang,
  • Jian Hur,
  • Jae-Bum Jun,
  • Younghee Jung,
  • Hyun-Ha Chang,
  • Young Keun Kim,
  • Jeong-Hwan Hwang,
  • Yeon-Sook Kim,
  • Hye Won Jeong,
  • Kyoung-Ho Song,
  • Wan Beom Park,
  • Eu Suk Kim,
  • Myoung-don Oh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3773-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is emerging in Asian 3 countries, China, Japan and Korea, which are scrub typhus endemic areas, and its incidence is increasing. As the two infections overlap epidemiologically and clinically and the accessibility or sensitivity of diagnostic tests is limited, early clinical prediction may be useful for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Methods Patients aged ≥16 years who were clinically suspected and laboratory-confirmed to be infected with Orientia tsutsugamushi or the SFTS virus in South Korea were enrolled. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared. Scrub typhus was further subclassified according to the status of eschar and skin rash. An SFTS prediction scoring tool was generated based on a logistic regression analysis of SFTS compared with scrub typhus. Results The analysis was performed on 255 patients with scrub typhus and 107 patients with SFTS. At initial presentation, subjective symptoms except for gastrointestinal symptoms, were more prominent in scrub typhus patients. In addition to the characteristic eschar and skin rash, headache was significantly more prominent in scrub typhus, while laboratory abnormalities were more prominent in SFTS. Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 4000/mm3; odds ratio [OR] 30.13), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 80,000 /mm3; OR 19.73) and low C-reactive protein (< 1 mg/dL; OR 67.46) were consistent risk factors for SFTS (all P < 0.001). A prediction score was generated using these 3 variables, and a score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.9–96.4%) and a specificity of 96.1% (95% CI, 93.8–97.6%) for SFTS. Conclusion This prediction scoring tool may be useful for differentiating SFTS from eschar- or skin rash-negative scrub typhus. It is a simple and readily applicable tool with potential for use in primary care settings.

Keywords