Nuclear Fusion (Jan 2023)

Validation of 2D and measurements made with Helium imaging spectroscopy in the volume of the TCV divertor

  • B.L. Linehan,
  • A. Perek,
  • B.P. Duval,
  • F. Bagnato,
  • P. Blanchard,
  • C. Colandrea,
  • H. De Oliveira,
  • O. Février,
  • E. Flom,
  • S. Gorno,
  • M. Goto,
  • E. Marmar,
  • L. Martinelli,
  • A. Mathews,
  • J. Muñoz-Burgos,
  • D. Mykytchuk,
  • N. Offeddu,
  • D.S. Oliveira,
  • H. Reimerdes,
  • D. Reiter,
  • O. Schmitz,
  • J.L. Terry,
  • C. Theiler,
  • C.K. Tsui,
  • B. Vincent,
  • T. Wijkamp,
  • C. Wüthrich,
  • W. Zholobenko,
  • the TCV Team

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acb5b0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 63, no. 3
p. 036021

Abstract

Read online

Multi-spectral imaging of helium atomic emission (HeMSI) has been used to create 2D poloidal maps of ${{T}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ and ${{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ in TCV’s divertor. To achieve these measurements, TCV’s MANTIS multispectral cameras (Perek et al 2019 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90 123514) simultaneously imaged four He I lines (two singlet and two triplet) and a He II line (468 nm) from passively present He and He ^+ . The images, which were absolutely calibrated and covered the whole divertor region, were inverted through the assumption of toroidal symmetry to create emissivity profiles and, consequently, line-ratio profiles. A collisional-radiative model (CRM) was applied to the line-ratio profiles to produce 2D poloidal maps of ${{T}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ and ${{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ . The collisional-radiative modeling was accomplished with the Goto helium CRM code (Zholobenko et al 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 126006, Zholobenko et al 2018 Technical Report , Goto 2003 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 76 331–44) which accounts for electron-impact excitation (EIE) and deexcitation, and electron–ion recombination (EIR) with ${\textrm{He}}^{+}$ . The HeMSI ${{T}}_{\mathrm {e}}$ and ${{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ measurements were compared with co-local Thomson scattering measurements. The two sets of measurements exhibited good agreement for ionizing plasmas: $({5 \,{\textrm{eV}} \leqslant {{T}}_{\mathrm{e}} \leqslant 60 \,{\textrm{eV}}}$ , and ${2 \times 10^{18}\, {\textrm{m}}^{-3} \leqslant{{n}}_{\mathrm{e}} \leqslant 3 \times 10^{19}\,{\textrm{m}}^{-3}})$ in the case of majority helium plasmas, and $({10 \,{\textrm{eV}} \leqslant {{T}}_{\mathrm{e}} \leqslant 40 \,{\textrm{eV}}},{2 \times 10^{18}\,{\textrm{m}}^{-3} \leqslant{{n}}_{\mathrm{e}} \leqslant 3 \times 10^{19} \,{\textrm{m}}^{-3}})$ in the case of majority deuterium plasmas. However, there were instances where HeMSI measurements diverged from Thomson scattering. When ${{T}}_{\mathrm{e}} \leqslant 10 \,{\textrm{eV}}$ in majority deuterium plasmas, HeMSI deduced inaccurately high values of ${{T}}_{\mathrm{e}}{}$ . This disagreement cannot be rectified within the CRM’s EIE and EIR framework. Second, on sporadic occasions within the private flux region, HeMSI produced erroneously high measurements of ${{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ . Multi-spectral imaging of Helium emission has been demonstrated to produce accurate 2D poloidal maps of ${{T}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ and ${{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}$ within the divertor of a tokamak for plasma conditions relevant to contemporary divertor studies.

Keywords