PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Are there sex differences in physiological parameters and reaction time responses to overload in firefighters?

  • Fabrizio Perroni,
  • Ludovica Cardinali,
  • Lamberto Cignitti,
  • Erica Gobbi,
  • Federico Grugni,
  • Stefano Amatori,
  • Marco Bruno Luigi Rocchi,
  • Luca Grandinetti,
  • Francesco Lunetta,
  • Vilberto Stocchi,
  • Carlo Baldari,
  • Davide Sisti,
  • Laura Guidetti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249559
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 5
p. e0249559

Abstract

Read online

Male and female firefighters work side-by-side in the same in strenuous and risky conditions. Anthropometrics, physiological, and reaction time (mean of reaction time -MRT-, and errors made -E) parameters of 12 Female and 13 Male firefighters were compared. Effect of overload (step test with and without equipment) on the MRT and E were analyzed on 3 trials (T1 = 1-1s, T2 = 0.5-1s, T3 = 0.5-0.5s), compared with a pre-test condition (basal). T-test between males and females was applied to assess differences (p<0.05) in all parameters. ANOVA with repeated measures and Bonferroni on 3 conditions of step test between males and females was applied in reaction time variables. Between MRT and E, in T1, T2 and T3 trials and the 3 test conditions, ANCOVA models with interactions were used. Differences (p<0.05) in anthropometric, physiological and reaction time data emerged across groups, and on the 3rd trials (T3 vs T1 and T2) in reaction time parameters of each group. ANCOVA showed differences (p<0.001) in E among trials. Post hoc showed significant differences in T1vsT3 and T1vsT2. MRT x trial interaction was extremely significant (P<0.001). Implementing fitness and reaction time exercise programs is important to decrease the injury risk and increase work capacity in firefighters with reference to female workers.