PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Targeted next-generation sequencing has incremental value in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspect pancreatic masses; a multi-center prospective cross sectional study.

  • Friso B Achterberg,
  • Babs G Sibinga Mulder,
  • Quisette P Janssen,
  • Bas Groot Koerkamp,
  • Lieke Hol,
  • Rutger Quispel,
  • Bert A Bonsing,
  • Alexander L Vahrmeijer,
  • Casper H J van Eijck,
  • Daphne Roos,
  • Lars E Perk,
  • Erwin van der Harst,
  • Peter-Paul L O Coene,
  • Michail Doukas,
  • Frank M M Smedts,
  • Mike Kliffen,
  • Marie-Louise F van Velthuysen,
  • Valeska Terpstra,
  • Arantza Farina Sarasqueta,
  • Hans Morreau,
  • J Sven D Mieog

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280939
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
p. e0280939

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe diagnostic process of patients with suspect pancreatic lesions is often lengthy and prone to repeated diagnostic procedures due to inconclusive results. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) performed on cytological material obtained with fine needle aspiration (FNA) or biliary duct brushing can speed up this process. Here, we study the incremental value of NGS for establishing the correct diagnosis, and subsequent treatment plan in patients with inconclusive diagnosis after regular diagnostic work-up for suspect pancreatic lesions.MethodsIn this prospective cross-sectional cohort study, patients were screened for inclusion in four hospitals. NGS was performed with AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 and v4b in patients with inconclusive cytology results or with an uncertain diagnosis. Diagnostic results were evaluated by the oncology pancreatic multidisciplinary team. The added value of NGS was determined by comparing diagnosis (malignancy, cystic lesion or benign condition) and proposed treatment plan (exploration/resection, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, follow-up, palliation or repeated FNA) before and after integration of NGS results. Final histopathological analysis or a 6-month follow-up period were used as the reference standard in case of surgical intervention or non-invasive treatment, respectively.ResultsIn 50 of the 53 included patients, cytology material was sufficient for NGS analysis. Diagnosis before and after integration of NGS results differed in 24% of the patients. The treatment plan was changed in 32% and the diagnosis was substantiated by the NGS data in 44%. Repetition of FNA/brushing was prevented in 14% of patients. All changes in treatment plan were correctly made after integration of NGS. Integration of NGS increased overall diagnostic accuracy from 68% to 94%.InterpretationThis study demonstrates the incremental diagnostic value of NGS in patients with an initial inconclusive diagnosis. Integration of NGS results can prevent repeated EUS/FNA, and can also rigorously change the final diagnosis and treatment plan.