Frontiers in Nutrition (May 2022)

The Risk Reduction Effect of a Nutritional Intervention With a Partially Hydrolyzed Whey-Based Formula on Cow's Milk Protein Allergy and Atopic Dermatitis in High-Risk Infants Within the First 6 Months of Life: The Allergy Reduction Trial (A.R.T.), a Multicenter Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

  • Nicolaos Nicolaou,
  • Nicolaos Nicolaou,
  • Rouzha Pancheva,
  • Eva Karaglani,
  • Mikaela Sekkidou,
  • Miglena Marinova-Achkar,
  • Simoneta Popova,
  • Margarita Tzaki,
  • Anastasia Kapetanaki,
  • Nicoletta Iacovidou,
  • Theodora Boutsikou,
  • Zoi Iliodromiti,
  • Vassiliki Papaevangelou,
  • Olympia Sardeli,
  • Paraskevi Xepapadaki,
  • Evangelia Papathoma,
  • Inge Thijs-Verhoeven,
  • Urszula Kudla,
  • Laurien H. Ulfman,
  • Anne Schaafsma,
  • Yannis Manios,
  • Yannis Manios

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.863599
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe role of partially hydrolyzed formulas (pHF) as part of nutritional interventions to prevent the development of allergic manifestations (AM) is questioned, and efficacy of each specific pHF should be substantiated.ObjectiveTo investigate the risk-reduction effect of a whey-based pHF on the development of cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) and atopic dermatitis (AD) in infants at high-risk for allergy within the first 6 months of life.Materials and MethodsIn a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled setting, healthy non-exclusively breastfed full-term infants, received either a specific whey-based pHF or a standard cow's milk-based formula (SF) and were clinically assessed for AM at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, supported by the objective scoring tools SCORAD and CoMiSS. CMPA was confirmed by open food challenge. Intention-to-Treat (ITT) and Per-Protocol (PP) analyses were performed.ResultsOf 331 randomized subjects (ITT analysis set), 160 received the pHF and 171 the SF. Six (3.8%) infants in the pHF and 12 (7%) in the SF group developed CMPA (p = 0.186). AD incidence was significantly lower in those receiving pHF as compared to SF (10.6% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.024) with a relative risk (RR, 95% CI) of 0.54 (0.32, 0.92), in particular when adjusting for family history of AD [6.5% vs. 27.3%, RR 0.24 (0.07, 0.78), p = 0.018] representing a risk reduction of 76%. The PP analysis showed similar results.ConclusionThis specific whey-based pHF reduced the risk of AD development, particularly in those with a family history of AD, and tended to reduce the development of CMPA in non-exclusively breastfed infants at high-risk for allergy. The A.R.T. study suggests that this particular pHF may contribute to measures aimed at prevention of allergic manifestations. However, further studies are needed to confirm this risk-reduction effect.

Keywords