Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Jan 2024)

Electric Cardioversion in Older Adults. Is Sedation Using Propofol Safe in the Absence of the Direct Anesthetist's Assistance?

  • Jarosław Karwowski MD, PhD,
  • Karol Wrzosek MD, PhD,
  • Jerzy Rekosz MD, PhD,
  • Katarzyna Tymoszuk MD,
  • Anna Wiktorska MD, PhD,
  • Katarzyna Szmarowska MD, PhD,
  • Mateusz Solecki MD, PhD,
  • Mirosław Dłużniewski MD, PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484231221929
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29

Abstract

Read online

Aims: This study aimed to assess the safety of electric cardioversion in the absence of anesthetists assistance. We also evaluated the efficacy and safety of this procedure in older adults (≥80 years) compared to younger populations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent electric cardioversion at our cardiology department. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to age: ≥ 80 years and 5 s occurred immediately after shock in 4.1% of older and 2.1% of younger patients ( P = .405). Propofol was used as a sedative, with a mean dose of 0.83 mg/kg versus 0.93 mg/kg, in older and younger patients, respectively. Intubation, medical intervention, or other advanced resuscitation techniques were not required. During hospitalization, arrhythmia recurred in 9.6% and 12.4% of the older and younger patients, respectively ( P = .537). Conclusions: Electrical cardioversion is an effective and safe procedure regardless of patient age. Sedation with propofol administered by cardiologists was safe. Adverse events were not considered serious or reversible.