Scientific Reports (Mar 2024)

Safety and efficacy of proactive versus reactive administration of desmopressin in severe symptomatic hyponatremia: a randomized controlled trial

  • Kamolwan Pakchotanon,
  • Nichanone Kanjanasuphak,
  • Anan Chuasuwan,
  • Pongsathorn Gojaseni,
  • Anutra Chittinandana

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57657-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of proactive versus reactive desmopressin (DDAVP) strategies in treating severe symptomatic hyponatremia. Conducted from June 20, 2022, to February 20, 2023, it involved 49 patients with serum sodium levels below 125 mmol/L. Patients were assigned to either the proactive group, receiving DDAVP immediately upon diagnosis, or the reactive group, receiving DDAVP only if the serum sodium level tended to be overcorrected. The primary outcome was the incidence of overcorrection. The study revealed no significant difference in the overcorrection incidence between the proactive (16.7%) and reactive (28%) groups (p = 0.54). The change in serum sodium levels at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h were not different, however, at 48 h, the proactive group exhibited a higher but still safe change in serum sodium levels compared to the reactive group (10.3 ± 3.6 mmol/L vs. 7.7 ± 3.6 mmol/L, p = 0.013). Other parameters including time to symptom improvement, total intravenous fluid administered, DDAVP dose, urine volume, hospital stay duration, osmotic demyelination syndrome incidence, and 28-day mortality did not significantly differ between the groups. In conclusion, our findings suggest that there was no significant disparity in overcorrection rates between proactive and reactive DDAVP strategies for treating severe symptomatic hyponatremia. However, further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these results.