How does fresh food prescribing fit into the social service landscape? A qualitative study in Ontario, Canada

Abstract

IntroductionFood prescription programs are part of the broader social prescribing movement as an approach to address food insecurity and suboptimal diet in health care settings. These programs exist amid other social services, including income-based supports and food assistance programs; however, evaluations of the interactions between these programs and pre-existing services and supports are limited. This study was embedded within a larger evaluation of the 52-week Fresh Food Prescription (FFRx) program (April 2021–October 2022); the objective of this study was to examine how program participation influenced individuals’ interactions with existing income-based supports and food assistance programs. MethodsThis study was conducted in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. One-to-one (n = 23) and follow-up (n = 10) interviews were conducted to explore participants’ experiences with the program. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using a constant comparative analysis. ResultsParticipants described their experience with FFRx in relation to existing income-based supports and food assistance programs. FFRx reportedly extended income support further to cover living expenses, allowed participants to divert income to other necessities, and reduced the sacrifices required to meet basic needs. FFRx lessened the frequency of accessing other food assistance programs. Aspects of FFRx’s design (e.g. food delivery) shaped participant preferences in favour of FFRx over other food supports. ConclusionAs food prescribing and other social prescribing programs continue to expand, there is a need to evaluate how these initiatives interact with pre-existing services and supports and shape the broader social service landscape.