Radiation Oncology (Aug 2020)

Low-dose cone-beam CT (LD-CBCT) reconstruction for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) by three-dimensional dual-dictionary learning

  • Ying Song,
  • Weikang Zhang,
  • Hong Zhang,
  • Qiang Wang,
  • Qing Xiao,
  • Zhibing Li,
  • Xing Wei,
  • Jialu Lai,
  • Xuetao Wang,
  • Wan Li,
  • Quan Zhong,
  • Pan Gong,
  • Renming Zhong,
  • Jun Zhao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01630-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To develop a low-dose cone beam CT (LD-CBCT) reconstruction method named simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique and dual-dictionary learning (SART-DDL) joint algorithm for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and evaluate its imaging quality and clinical application ability. Methods In this retrospective study, 62 CBCT image sets from February 2018 to July 2018 at west china hospital were randomly collected from 42 head and neck patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 49.7 [11.4] years, 12 females and 30 males). All image sets were retrospectively reconstructed by SART-DDL (resultant D-CBCT image sets) with 18% less clinical raw projections. Reconstruction quality was evaluated by quantitative parameters compared with SART and Total Variation minimization (SART-TV) joint reconstruction algorithm with paired t test. Five-grade subjective grading evaluations were done by two oncologists in a blind manner compared with clinically used Feldkamp-Davis-Kress algorithm CBCT images (resultant F-CBCT image sets) and the grading results were compared by paired Wilcoxon rank test. Registration results between D-CBCT and F-CBCT were compared. D-CBCT image geometry fidelity was tested. Results The mean peak signal to noise ratio of D-CBCT was 1.7 dB higher than SART-TV reconstructions (P .05). In clinical registration, the maximum translational and rotational difference was 1.8 mm and 1.7 degree respectively. The horizontal, vertical and sagittal geometry fidelity of D-CBCT were acceptable. Conclusions The image quality, geometry fidelity and clinical application ability of D-CBCT are comparable to that of the F-CBCT for head-and-neck patients with 18% less projections by SART-DDL.

Keywords