Cancer Medicine (Jul 2022)

BRCA1/2 testing among young women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, 2010–2013: An observational study using state cancer registry and All‐Payer claims data

  • Lydia E. Pace,
  • John Z. Ayanian,
  • Robert E. Wolf,
  • Richard Knowlton,
  • Susan T. Gershman,
  • Summer Sherburne Hawkins,
  • Nancy L. Keating

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4648
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 13
pp. 2679 – 2686

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Testing for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants is recommended for women aged ≤45 years with breast cancer. Some studies have found racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in testing. We linked Massachusetts' All‐Payer Claims Database with Massachusetts Cancer Registry data to assess factors associated with BRCA1/2 testing among young women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, a state with high levels of access to care and equitable insurance coverage of breast cancer gene (BRCA) testing. Methods We identified breast cancer diagnoses in the Massachusetts Cancer Registry from 2010 to 2013 and linked registry data with Massachusetts All‐Payer Claims Data from 2010 to 2014 among women aged ≤45 years with private insurance or Medicaid. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with BRCA1/2 testing within 6 months of diagnosis. Results The study population included 2424 women; 80.3% were identified as non‐Hispanic White, 6.4% non‐Hispanic Black, and 6.3% Hispanic. Overall, 54.9% received BRCA1/2 testing within 6 months of breast cancer diagnosis. In adjusted analyses, non‐Hispanic Black women had less than half the odds of testing compared with non‐Hispanic White women (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.64). Medicaid‐insured women had half the odds of testing compared with privately‐insured women (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.41, 0.63). Living in lower‐income areas was also associated with lower odds of testing. Having an academically‐affiliated oncology clinician was not associated with testing. Conclusion Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities exist in BRCA1/2 testing among women with breast cancer in Massachusetts, despite equitable insurance coverage of testing. Further research should examine whether disparities have persisted with growing testing awareness and availability over time.

Keywords