BioMedical Engineering OnLine (May 2021)

Viscoelasticity measured by shear wave elastography in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis

  • Zhaoke Pi,
  • Mengke Wang,
  • Haoming Lin,
  • Yanrong Guo,
  • Siping Chen,
  • Xianfen Diao,
  • Hui Xia,
  • Guoqiang Liu,
  • Jie Zeng,
  • Xinyu Zhang,
  • Xin Chen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00879-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rapidly becoming one of the most common liver diseases. Ultrasound elastography has been used for the diagnosis of NAFLD. However, clinical research on steatosis by elastography technology has mainly focused on steatosis with fibrosis or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), while steatosis without fibrosis has been poorly studied. Moreover, the relationship between liver viscoelasticity and steatosis grade is not clear. In this study, we evaluated the degree of liver steatosis in a simple steatosis rat model using shear wave elastography (SWE). Results The viscoelasticity values of 69 rats with hepatic steatosis were measured quantitatively by SWE in vivo and validated by a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) test. Pathological sections were used to determine the steatosis grade for each rat. The results showed that the elasticity values µ obtained by the two methods followed the same trend, and µ is significantly correlated with liver steatosis. The Pearson’s correlation coefficients indicate that $$\mu$$ μ obtained by SWE is positively linear correlated with DMA (r = 0.628, p = 7.85 × 10–9). However, the viscosity values $$\eta$$ η obtained by SWE were relatively independent of those obtained by DMA with a correlation coefficient of − 0.01. The combined Voigt elasticity measurements have high validity in the prediction of steatosis (S0 vs. S1–S4), with an AUROC of 0.755 (95% CI 0.6175–0.8925, p < 0.01) and the optimal cutoff value was 2.08 kPa with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 63%. Conclusion SWE might have the feasibility to be introduced as an auxiliary technique for NAFLD patients in clinical settings. However, the viscosity results measured by SWE and DMA are significantly different, because the two methods work in different frequency bands.

Keywords