Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics (Oct 2024)

Descriptive analysis of the cases published in the Align® Global Gallery

  • Luísa Schubach da Costa BARRETO,
  • Rafael Cunha BITTENCOURT,
  • Marcella Barreto FERREIRA,
  • Sarah Braga Sayão de PAULA,
  • Cláudia Trindade MATTOS,
  • José Augusto Mendes MIGUEL

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242474.oar
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 5

Abstract

Read online Read online

ABSTRACT Introduction: Social media enhanced access to information, making it easier to share dental treatments. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a descriptive analysis of the clinical cases published on the Align® Global Gallery platform. Material and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 1,582 cases was conducted, data extracted referred to the following basic information: case number; patient’s age; reported gender; Invisalign® package modality; treatment time; aligner exchange protocol; total number of aligners per arch; type of retainers, and inclusion of initial and final panoramic and cephalometric radiographs. Results: The majority were young (mean age 24.6 years, SD = 11.6), female patients (69.1%) with Class I malocclusion (39.4%) and crowding (77.9%). Comprehensive treatment was common (66.5%), with an average treatment time of 18 months (SD = 8.56; 95% CI = 17.6-18.5), with the most frequently reported aligner exchange protocol being 7 days (49.5%), with an average of 50.6 aligners in the upper arch (SD = 26.9; 95% CI = 49.2-51.9), and 48.7 in the lower arch (SD = 26.1; 95% CI = 47.4-50.0). Arch expansion (66.9%) and interproximal reduction (59.7%) were common approaches, while extractions were rare (4.3%). In most cases, initial lateral cephalometric (80.4%) and panoramic (93.3%) radiographs were presented. However, the final radiograph count dropped, with lateral cephalometric at 69.2%, and panoramic at 82.2% of cases. Conclusion: Cases in the Align®Global Gallery mostly feature Class I patients with crowded teeth, treated with expansion and interproximal reduction. The absence of standardized information and post-treatment data restricts the applicability of these findings to broader Invisalign® treatment trends.

Keywords