Applied Sciences (Jun 2024)

Validation of Frontal Crashworthiness Simulation for Low-Entry Type Bus Body According to UNECE R29 Requirements

  • Kostyantyn Holenko,
  • Oleksandr Dykha,
  • Eugeniusz Koda,
  • Ivan Kernytskyy,
  • Yuriy Royko,
  • Orest Horbay,
  • Oksana Berezovetska,
  • Vasyl Rys,
  • Ruslan Humenuyk,
  • Serhii Berezovetskyi,
  • Mariusz Żółtowski,
  • Anna Markiewicz,
  • Tomasz Wierzbicki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135595
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 13
p. 5595

Abstract

Read online

Frontal crash tests are an essential element in assessing vehicle safety. They simulate a collision that occurs when the front of the bus hits another vehicle or an obstacle. In recent years, much attention has been paid to the frontal crash testing of city buses, especially after a series of accidents resulting in deaths and injuries. Unlike car manufacturers, most bus bodybuilders do not include deformation zones in their designs. The next two regulations are widely used to assess whether a structure can withstand impact loading: UNECE Regulation No. 29—United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE R29) and the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), which is more typical of car crash tests. The main goal of the research is to develop an applicable methodology for a frontal impact simulation on a city bus, considering UNECE R29 requirements for the passenger’s safety and distinctive features of the low-entry body layout. Among the contributions to current knowledge are such research results as: unlike suburban and intercity buses, city buses are characterized by lower stiffness in the event of a frontal collision, and therefore, when developing new models, it is necessary to lay deformation zones (currently absent from most city buses). Maximum deformation values in the bus front part are reached earlier for R29 (137 ms) than for most impacts tested by NCAP (170–230 ms) but have higher values: 577 mm vs. 150–250 mm for the sills tested. Such a short shock absorption time and high deformations indicate a significantly lighter front part of a low-entry and low-floor bus compared with classic layouts. Furthermore, it is unjustified to use the R29 boundary conditions of trucks to attach the bus with chains behind its frontal axe both in natural tests and appropriate finite element simulation—the scheme of fixing the city bus should be accordingly adapted and normatively revised.

Keywords