Forests (Jan 2023)

The Differences in Water Repellency in Root Mat (Biomat) and Soil Horizons of Thinned and Non-thinned <i>Chamaecyparis obtusa</i> (Siebold et Zucc.) Endl. Plantations

  • Moein Farahnak,
  • Takanori Sato,
  • Yuya Otani,
  • Koichiro Kuraji,
  • Toko Suzaki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020210
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2
p. 210

Abstract

Read online

Water repellency (WR) is one cause of root mat (biomat) flow and soil surface runoff in dense Chamaecyparis obutsa (Siebold et Zucc.) Endl. plantations. However, the changes in WR of biomat and soil horizons are unclear in the thinned C. obtusa plantations. This study compares the WR of biomat and soil horizons in the thinned and non-thinned C. obtusa plantations by considering the water content and surface temperature of biomat and soil from July 2021 to June 2022. We selected one plot in each thinned and non-thinned area in a catchment at Obora Experimental Forest in Japan. Our results showed that the 40% thinned plot lacked a biomat horizon, whereas the non-thinned plot had a ca. 3 cm depth of biomat. The biomat WR of the non-thinned plot (none to very strong) was higher than the soil WR of the thinned plot (none to strong). There was no relationship between WR and both water content and surface temperature of biomat and/or soil in either thinned or non-thinned plots. Our findings show that the biomat horizon had an essential role in the severity of WR in C. obtusa plantations. The lack of biomat after thinning could substantially impact soil surface hydrology.

Keywords