BMJ Open (Oct 2023)

Efficacy of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in type 1 diabetes: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials

  • Sabrina Schlesinger,
  • Oliver Kuss,
  • Joachim Rosenbauer,
  • Reinhard Holl,
  • Anna Stahl-Pehe,
  • Nafiseh Shokri-Mashhadi,
  • Christina Bächle,
  • Klaus-D Warz,
  • Jutta Bürger-Büsing,
  • Olaf Spörkel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074317
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 10

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Automated insulin delivery (AID), also known as artificial pancreas system or ‘closed-loop system’, represents a novel option for current treatments for type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of AID systems in comparison with current intensified insulin therapy for glycaemic control and patient-reported outcomes in individuals with T1D.Methods and analysis Studies will be eligible if they are randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with T1D of all ages, and if they compare an AID system for self-administration during the day and night period with any other type of insulin therapy for at least 3 weeks. The primary outcome will be time in the glucose target range of 70–180 mg/dL. A systematic review will be conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov registries from their inception dates. Two authors will independently screen all references based on titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria. For data extraction, standard forms will be developed and tested before extraction. All information will be assessed independently by at least two reviewers. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. The data synthesis will include a random-effects pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) in a frequentist framework. Where applicable and if sufficient RCTs are available, sensitivity analyses will be performed, and heterogeneity and publication bias will be assessed. The certainty of evidence from the NMA will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation working group guidance.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is needed. The results will be reported to the funder, presented in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and at conferences, and disseminated via press release, social media and public events.PROSPERO registration number CRD42023395492.