PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Evidence of rotavirus vaccine impact in sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Opolot Godfrey,
  • Weidong Zhang,
  • Cecilia Amponsem-Boateng,
  • Timothy Bonney Oppong,
  • QingLin Zhao,
  • Dankang Li

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232113
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 4
p. e0232113

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundOver 34 countries in Africa have introduced rotavirus vaccine to their national immunization programs: monovalent (Rotarix®, RV1) and pentavalent (RotaTeq®, RV5) after South Africa introduced it in 2009. Since then several studies assessing the impact of the vaccine have been conducted. The principal aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of rotavirus vaccine in sub-Saharan Africa.MethodsA Literature search was performed using Mendeley, PubMed, ScienceDirect, grey literature and Web of Science databases of published studies from January 1, 2017, as years of recent publications on rotavirus vaccine impact in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis was conducted for rotavirus infection in children under 5 years using proportions of pre and post-vaccine introduction in these populations. Random-effect estimates were considered since the samples were from universal populations.ResultsOut of the 935 articles identified, 17 studies met the inclusion for systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled proportion for pre-vaccination period was 42%, 95% (CI: 38-46%), and reduced to 21%, 95% (CI: 17-25%) during post-vaccination period. Rotavirus diarrhea significantly reduced in children ConclusionWe observed that the introduction of the rotavirus vaccine was partly responsible for the significant reduction in the burden of rotavirus-associated diarrhea in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, there is a need to encourage the remaining countries to introduce the vaccine to their routine national immunization programs.