Brain Sciences (May 2024)

Low-Cost 3D Models for Cervical Spine Tumor Removal Training for Neurosurgery Residents

  • Albert Sufianov,
  • Carlos Salvador Ovalle,
  • Omar Cruz,
  • Javier Contreras,
  • Emir Begagić,
  • Siddarth Kannan,
  • Andreina Rosario Rosario,
  • Gennady Chmutin,
  • Garifullina Nargiza Askatovna,
  • Jesus Lafuente,
  • Jose Soriano Sanchez,
  • Renat Nurmukhametov,
  • Manuel Eduardo Soto García,
  • Nikolay Peev,
  • Mirza Pojskić,
  • Gervith Reyes-Soto,
  • Ismail Bozkurt,
  • Manuel De Jesus Encarnación Ramírez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14060547
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 6
p. 547

Abstract

Read online

Background and Objectives: Spinal surgery, particularly for cervical pathologies such as myelopathy and radiculopathy, requires a blend of theoretical knowledge and practical skill. The complexity of these conditions, often necessitating surgical intervention, underscores the need for intricate understanding and precision in execution. Advancements in neurosurgical training, especially with the use of low-cost 3D models for simulating cervical spine tumor removal, are revolutionizing this field. These models provide the realistic and hands-on experience crucial for mastering complex neurosurgical techniques, filling gaps left by traditional educational methods. Materials and Methods: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of 3D-printed cervical vertebrae models in enhancing surgical skills, focusing on tumor removal, and involving 20 young neurosurgery residents. These models, featuring silicone materials to simulate the spinal cord and tumor tissues, provided a realistic training experience. The training protocol included a laminectomy, dural incision, and tumor resection, using a range of microsurgical tools, focusing on steps usually performed by senior surgeons. Results: The training program received high satisfaction rates, with 85% of participants extremely satisfied and 15% satisfied. The 3D models were deemed very realistic by 85% of participants, effectively replicating real-life scenarios. A total of 80% found that the simulated pathologies were varied and accurate, and 90% appreciated the models’ accurate tactile feedback. The training was extremely useful for 85% of the participants in developing surgical skills, with significant post-training confidence boosts and a strong willingness to recommend the program to peers. Conclusions: Continuing laboratory training for residents is crucial. Our model offers essential, accessible training for all hospitals, regardless of their resources, promising improved surgical quality and patient outcomes across various pathologies.

Keywords