Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (Dec 2023)

ddPCR provides a sensitive test compared with GeneXpert MTB/RIF and mNGS for suspected Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

  • Dan Zhang,
  • Dan Zhang,
  • Dan Zhang,
  • Fei Yu,
  • Fei Yu,
  • Fei Yu,
  • Dongsheng Han,
  • Dongsheng Han,
  • Dongsheng Han,
  • Weizhen Chen,
  • Weizhen Chen,
  • Weizhen Chen,
  • Lingjun Yuan,
  • Mengxiao Xie,
  • Jieyuan Zheng,
  • Jingchao Wang,
  • Bin Lou,
  • Bin Lou,
  • Bin Lou,
  • Shufa Zheng,
  • Shufa Zheng,
  • Shufa Zheng,
  • Yu Chen,
  • Yu Chen,
  • Yu Chen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1216339
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThe Metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) exhibited a sensitivity for tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic performance. Research that directly compared the clinical performance of ddPCR analysis, mNGS, and Xpert in mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) infection has not been conducted.MethodsThe study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ddPCR compared to mNGS and Xpert for the detection of MTB in multiple types of clinical samples. The final clinical diagnosis was used as the reference standard.ResultsOut of 236 patients with suspected active TB infection, 217 underwent synchronous testing for tuberculosis using ddPCR, Xpert, and mNGS on direct clinical samples. During follow-up, 100 out of 217 participants were diagnosed with MTB infection. Compared to the clinical final diagnosis, ddPCR produced the highest sensitivity of 99% compared with mNGS (86%) and Xpert (64%) for all active MTB cases. DiscussionTwenty-two Xpert-negative samples were positive in mNGS tests, which confirmed the clinical diagnosis results from ddPCR and clinical manifestation, radiologic findings. Thirteen mNGS-negative samples were positive in ddPCR assays, which confirmed the clinical final diagnosis.ddPCR provides a higher sensitive compared to Xpert and mNGS for MTB diagnosis, as defined by the high concordance between ddPCR assay and clinical final diagnosis.

Keywords