The Histology-Driven Differential Diagnosis in Bowel Inflammatory Conditions Is Not All That Obvious: Evidence from a Survey Based on Digital Slides

Abstract

(1) Background: when the pathologist faces histologic slides from colonoscopies in daily practice, given the large number of entities and etiologies under inflammatory bowel conditions, in-depth definition of the histological spectrum and the recommendations of current guidelines are often not enough to conclusively define a diagnostic framework. Histological patterns should be organized hierarchically in flowcharts that consider the correlation with clinical data. We conducted an online survey asking a group of gastroenteropathologists to apply a pattern classification based on the most significant lesions in colitis differential diagnosis: crypt distortion and activity. (2) Methods: digital slides from 20 endoscopy samples were analyzed by twenty pathologists and classified according to the occurrence of crypt distortion (nondestructive–destructive colitis) and subsequently to the evidence of activity (ND1-2-3, D1-2). (3) Results: in 8 out of 20 (40%) cases, the participants reached a full agreement regarding the evaluation of crypt distortion (5 cases: nondestructive colitis; 3 cases: destructive colitis). The calculated agreement was k = 0.432. In the second-level quiz (ND1-2-3 and D1-2), full agreement between participants was achieved for 7 of the 28 (25%) possible classifications, with k = 0.229. (4) Conclusions: The findings from this survey are indicative of an unexpectedly low consensus, even among dedicated pathologists, about the recognition of histological changes that are commonly considered critical lesions in the histologic identification of bowel non-neoplastic diseases. In our opinion, these divergences imply a significant risk of misdiagnosis of bowel inflammatory conditions, hampering the usefulness of histological assessment.

Keywords

• inflammatory bowel disease
• histology
• diagnosis
• pattern
• agreement