ERJ Open Research (Nov 2022)

Relevance of comorbidities on initial combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension

  • Roberto Badagliacca,
  • Michele D'Alto,
  • Stefano Ghio,
  • Paola Argiento,
  • Natale Daniele Brunetti,
  • Gavino Casu,
  • Nadia Cedrone,
  • Marco Confalonieri,
  • Marco Corda,
  • Michele Correale,
  • Carlo D'Agostino,
  • Lucrezia De Michele,
  • Serena Di Marino,
  • Domenico Filomena,
  • Giuseppe Galgano,
  • Alessandra Greco,
  • Carlo Lombardi,
  • Giovanna Manzi,
  • Valentina Mercurio,
  • Massimiliano Mulè,
  • Giuseppe Paciocco,
  • Silvia Papa,
  • Emanuele Romeo,
  • Laura Scelsi,
  • Davide Stolfo,
  • Patrizio Vitulo,
  • Carmine Dario Vizza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00298-2022
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Rationale Demographic characteristics of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients have changed over time, but the effects of cardiovascular risk factors on risk status and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) reduction with initial oral combination therapy are not known. Therefore, we tested the relevance of cardiovascular comorbidities in this setting. Methods The study enrolled 181 treatment-naive PAH patients with a 6-month (IQR 144–363 days) right heart catheterisation and risk assessment after initial oral combination therapy. Results Group A included 96 (53.0%) patients without cardiac comorbidities; Group B included 54 (29.8%) patients with one cardiac comorbidity; Group C included 31 (17.1%) patients with two cardiac comorbidities or more. Group C patients were older with a balanced sex distribution. There was a significant difference in PVR reduction moving from the absence to one or at least two cardiac comorbidities, respectively: median −45.0%, −30.3%, −24.3%. A European Respiratory Society/European Society of Cardiology low-risk status was present at first follow-up in 50 (52.0%) patients in Group A, 19 (35.1%) in Group B and 9 (29.0%) in Group C; a REVEAL 2.0 low-risk status was present at first follow-up in 41 (42.0%) patients in Group A, 15 (27.7%) in Group B and 7 (22.6%) in Group C. Group A patients were 2.3 times more likely to achieve/maintain a low-risk status compared with Group B and C (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.15–4.54, p=0.02). No significant difference was observed between patients with non-cardiac comorbidities and those without comorbidities. Conclusion Initial oral combination therapy seems associated with a less effective response for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities compared with the others, related to the magnitude of treatment-induced decrease in PVR.