Arguing for Atonement?

Abstract

According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement.

Keywords

• Abstract Objects
• Aseity
• Atonement
• Nominalism
• Platonism