Comparison of the predictive ability for perinatal acidemia in neonates between the NICHD 3-tier FHR system combined with clinical risk factors and the fetal reserve index

Abstract

Background Electronic fetal monitoring alone is a poor screening test for detecting fetuses at risk of acidemia or asphyxia. We aimed to evaluation of predictive ability of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 3-tier fetal heart rate (FHR) system combined with the maternal, obstetric, and fetal risk factors for predicting perinatal acidemia, and to compare this with the predictive of the NICHD 3-tier system alone, and the Fetal Reserve Index (FRI). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among singleton term pregnant women. Fetal heart rate tracings of the last two hours before delivery were interpreted into the NICHD 3-tier FHR classification system by two experienced obstetricians. Demographic data were compared using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Student’s t test for continuous variables. Logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with perinatal acidemia in neonates. The Odds ratios (OR) and probabilities with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results A total of 674 pregnant women were enrolled in this study. Using the NICHD 3-tier FHR categories I and II combined with the selected risk factors (AUC 0.62) had a better performance for perinatal acidemia prediction than the NICHD 3-tier FHR alone (AUC 0.55) and the FRI (AUC 0.52), (PConclusions The NICHD 3-tier FHR categories I or II combined with selected risk factors can improve the predictive ability of perinatal acidemia in neonates compared with the NICHD 3-tier system alone or the FRI.