eJHaem (Nov 2022)

Selinexor‐based regimens in patients with multiple myeloma after prior anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen treatment

  • Muhamed Baljevic,
  • Cristina Gasparetto,
  • Gary J. Schiller,
  • Sascha A. Tuchman,
  • Natalie S. Callander,
  • Suzanne Lentzsch,
  • Jorge Monge,
  • Rami Kotb,
  • Nizar J. Bahlis,
  • Darrell White,
  • Christine I. Chen,
  • Heather J. Sutherland,
  • Sumit Madan,
  • Richard LeBlanc,
  • Michael Sebag,
  • Christopher P. Venner,
  • William I. Bensinger,
  • Noa Biran,
  • Andrew DeCastro,
  • Dane R. Van Domelen,
  • Chris Zhang,
  • Jatin J. Shah,
  • Sharon Shacham,
  • Michael G. Kauffman,
  • Ohad S. Bentur,
  • Brea Lipe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jha2.572
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 4
pp. 1270 – 1276

Abstract

Read online

Abstract There is a lack of consensus on therapy sequencing in previously treated multiple myeloma, particularly after anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA) therapy. Earlier reports on selinexor (X) regimens demonstrated considerable efficacy in early treatment, and after anti‐BCMA‐targeted chimeric antigen receptor‐T cell therapy. Here, we present data from 11 heavily pretreated patients who predominantly received BCMA‐antibody‐drug conjugate therapy. We observe that X‐containing regimens are potent and achieve durable responses with numerically higher overall response and clinical benefit rates, as well as median progression free survival compared to patients’ prior anti‐BCMA therapies, despite being used later in the treatment course. In an area of evolving unmet need, these data reaffirm the efficacy of X‐based regimens following broader anti‐BCMA therapy.

Keywords