Structural Heart (Jan 2024)

The Ozaki Procedure: Standardized Protocol Adoption of a Complex Innovative Procedure

  • Viral Patel, MD,
  • Shinya Unai, MD,
  • Ryan Moore, MD,
  • Habib Layoun, MD,
  • Serge Harb, MD,
  • Michael Z.Y. Tong, MD,
  • Tara Karamlou, MD,
  • Hani K. Najm, MD,
  • Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD,
  • Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD,
  • Eugene H. Blackstone, MD,
  • Gösta B. Pettersson, MD, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
p. 100217

Abstract

Read online

Background: The Ozaki procedure using autologous pericardium is an interesting but complex alternative for aortic valve replacement. We present a standardized approach to minimize the learning curve and confirm reproducibility. Methods: After careful preparation, from May 2015 to February 2021, an Ozaki procedure was performed on 46 patients age 51 ± 14 years. Seven had unicuspid (15%), 29 bicuspid (63%), and 10 tricuspid (22%) aortic valves, and 2 patients had endocarditis. Endpoints were operative learning curves, perioperative outcomes, intermediate-term valve hemodynamics, reintervention, health-related quality of life (MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire), and mortality. Results: Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamp times decreased from 145 to 125 ​minutes and 120 to 100 ​minutes, respectively, over the first 20 cases, reflecting the learning curve. There was no major perioperative morbidity or mortality. Median postoperative stay was 6.9 days. Aortic regurgitation was mild or less in all but 2 patients who developed moderate aortic regurgitation. Mean aortic valve gradient was 7.9 mmHg postoperatively, 9.2 mmHg by 6 months, and constant thereafter. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 58% preoperatively, 60% at 6 months, and remained stable thereafter. One patient developed infective endocarditis 7 months postoperatively, failed medical management, and underwent valve replacement at 14 months. Two-year survival was 96%, with 1 noncardiac death at 16 months. Health-related quality of life in mental, physical, and emotional domains was better than matched norms, global 6.2 vs. 5.0 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Using a well-prepared standardized approach, the Ozaki procedure is reproducible with a short learning curve, excellent hemodynamic performance, and good quality of life.

Keywords