BMC Medicine (Sep 2023)

Establishing the relationships between adiposity and reproductive factors: a multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis

  • Claire Prince,
  • Laura D. Howe,
  • Gemma C. Sharp,
  • Abigail Fraser,
  • Rebecca C. Richmond

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03051-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Few studies have investigated associations between adiposity and reproductive factors using causal methods, both of which have a number of consequences on women’s health. Here we assess whether adiposity at different points in the lifecourse affects reproductive factors differently and independently, and the plausibility of the impact of reproductive factors on adiposity. Methods We used genetic data from UK Biobank (273,238 women) and other consortia (EGG, GIANT, ReproGen and SSGAC) for eight reproductive factors: age at menarche, age at menopause, age at first birth, age at last birth, number of births, being parous, age first had sexual intercourse and lifetime number of sexual partners, and two adiposity traits: childhood and adulthood body size. We applied multivariable Mendelian randomization to account for genetic correlation and to estimate the causal effects of childhood and adulthood adiposity, independently of each other, on reproductive factors. Additionally, we estimated the effects of reproductive factors, independently of other relevant reproductive factors, on adulthood adiposity. Results We found a higher childhood body size leads to an earlier age at menarche, and an earlier age at menarche leads to a higher adulthood body size. Furthermore, we find contrasting and independent effects of childhood and adulthood body size on age at first birth (beta 0.22 SD (95% confidence interval: 0.14, 0.31) vs − 2.49 (− 2.93, − 2.06) per 1 SD increase), age at last birth (0.13 (0.06,0.21) vs − 1.86 (− 2.23, − 1.48) per 1 SD increase), age at menopause (0.17 (0.09, 0.25) vs − 0.99 (− 1.39, − 0.59) per 1 SD increase), and likelihood of having children (Odds ratio 0.97 (0.95, 1.00) vs 1.20 (1.06, 1.37) per 1 SD increase). Conclusions Our findings demonstrate the importance of considering a lifecourse approach when investigating the inter-relationships between adiposity measures and reproductive events, as well as the use of ‘age specific’ genetic instruments when evaluating lifecourse hypotheses in a Mendelian randomization framework.

Keywords