Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Mar 2023)

Anatomic distribution of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism: A 10-year retrospective analysis

  • Jianjun Zhang,
  • Yan Chen,
  • Zhicong Wang,
  • Zhicong Wang,
  • Xi Chen,
  • Yuehong Liu,
  • Mozhen Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1154875
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

AimsTo investigate the potential relationship between anatomic distribution of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).MethodsA retrospective case-control study was performed in patients diagnosed with LEDVT, which were confirmed by bilateral lower extremity compression ultrasonography (CUS) examination. According to the ultrasound reports, thrombus sidedness was categorized as unilateral and bilateral lower extremity, thrombus location was classified into distal and proximal LEDVT. Anatomic distributions of LEDVT were further subdivided depending on the combination of thrombus sidedness and location. Patients with PE were identified using the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes (I26.0 and I26.9), and divided into PE group and Non-PE group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between anatomic distribution of LEDVT and PE. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.ResultsA total of 2,363 consecutive patients with LEDVT were included, of whom 66.10% and 33.90% were unilateral and bilateral LEDVT, as well as 71.39% and 28.61% were isolated distal and proximal LEDVT, respectively. After the diagnosis of LEDVT, 185 patients (7.83%) developed PE. The proportions of PE ranged between the lowest (4.07%) in unilateral-distal LEDVT and highest (14.55%) in bilateral-proximal LEDVT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that bilateral LEDVT (odds ratios [OR] = 2.455, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.803–3.344, P < 0.001) and proximal LEDVT (OR = 1.530, 95% CI: 1.105–2.118, P = 0.010) were risk factors for developing PE. Moreover, unilateral-proximal (OR = 2.129, 95% CI: 1.365–3.320, P = 0.00), bilateral-distal (OR = 3.193, 95% CI: 2.146–4.752, P < 0.001) and bilateral-proximal LEDVT(OR = 3.425, 95% CI: 2.093–5.603, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with an increased risk of PE. Sensitivity analyses also confirmed the robustness of these associations.ConclusionPatients with unilateral-proximal, bilateral-distal or bilateral-proximal are more likely to suffer from PE than those with unilateral-distal LEDVT.

Keywords