Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (Aug 2024)

Experimental and Simulation Studies on Protective Structures in Floating Dock

  • Zhengyao Wang,
  • Kun Liu,
  • Jingqiao Liu,
  • Qingao Meng,
  • Weijian Qiu,
  • Shuai Zong

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081311
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 8
p. 1311

Abstract

Read online

In this research, two distinct designs of protective structures were developed to address structural damage caused by ships impacting the internal structures of floating docks during maintenance operations. The designed protective structures consist of support sections and load-bearing sections, with the load-bearing section comprising three frame sections. For ease of description, the front frame section, middle frame section, and rear frame section are referred to as Frame A, Frame B, and Frame C, respectively. A drop-weight test was conducted with a stern-shaped indenter impacting the structures at 3.89 m/s. This study also assessed varying impact speeds and positions. The results showed that Specimen 2 had localized indentations on Frame B, while Specimen 1 exhibited overall deformation of Frame B and additional deformations in Frame A. The simulations agreed with the experimental results, confirming the model’s accuracy. At speeds from 2.34 m/s to 5.45 m/s, Specimen 2 consistently showed localized deformations, while Specimen 1 showed comprehensive deformation of Frame B at 3.89 m/s due to lower rigidity. When the indenter impacted the specimens at different locations with a speed of 5.45 m/s, the two specimens exhibited varying degrees of damage. As the impact location shifted from the central area to the end, the maximum indentation depth of Specimen 1 decreased from 52.26 mm to 41.71 mm, while that of Specimen 2 decreased from 43.26 mm to 38.50 mm. The reduction in indentation depth and extent as the impact location approached the support frame can be attributed to the increasing involvement of the web plate beneath the frame in resisting the impact. Additionally, compared to Specimen 1, Specimen 2 exhibited a relatively smaller overall indentation depth, and the impact of location variation on indentation depth was also relatively minor.

Keywords