Hypertension evaluation and management in new young patients: are we doing our female patients a disservice?

Abstract

Purpose Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of death in women, largely underpinned by hypertension. Current guidelines recommend first-line therapy with a RAAS-blocking agent especially in young people. There are well documented sex disparities in CVD outcomes and management. We evaluate the management of patients with newly diagnosed hypertension in a tertiary care clinic to assess male–female differences in investigation and treatment.Methods Clinic letters of all new patients under the age of 51 attending the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic between January and December 2023 were reviewed. The primary outcomes measured were first-line treatment choices, deviations from guideline-recommended treatment, investigations for secondary hypertension, and documentation of female-specific risk factors and family planning advice. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure at referral and at the new patient appointment, age at diagnosis, age at first appointment, and the number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed at referral.Results One hundred and five (59:46, M:F) new patient encounters were reviewed after sixteen exclusions for non-attendance and inappropriate clinic coding. Choice of first line antihypertensive agent did not vary between sexes with no deviation from guideline-recommended medical therapy. Men, however, had more biochemical investigations conducted for secondary causes across all ages. This was greatest in those under 40 years old. There was suboptimal documentation of female-specific risk factors (obstetric and gynaecological history), contraceptive drug history and family planning with 35%, 20%, and 15.6%, respectively.Conclusion In 2023, women under 51 years of age seen in a tertiary care hypertension clinic received similar first-line treatment to their male peers. However, relevant female-specific histories were suboptimally documented for these patients. Whilst therapeutic approaches in men and women appear to be similar in this clinic, there are opportunities to improve CVD prevention in women, even in a specialised clinic setting.

Keywords

• Cardiovascular disease
• hypertension
• audit
• documentation practices
• female risk factors
• sex disparities