BMC Gastroenterology (Dec 2021)

Intravenous tacrolimus is a superior induction therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis compared to oral tacrolimus

  • Hiromichi Shimizu,
  • Toshimitsu Fujii,
  • Kenji Kinoshita,
  • Ami Kawamoto,
  • Shuji Hibiya,
  • Kento Takenaka,
  • Eiko Saito,
  • Masakazu Nagahori,
  • Kazuo Ohtsuka,
  • Mamoru Watanabe,
  • Ryuichi Okamoto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02043-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Intravenous corticosteroid is the mainstay for managing acute severe ulcerative colitis, but one-third of patients do not respond to intravenous corticosteroid. Tacrolimus, a salvage therapy before colectomy, is usually orally administered, though its bioavailability is low compared intravenous administration. The efficacy of intravenous tacrolimus has not been widely studied. Aim To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous tacrolimus for the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis. Methods Eighty-seven hospitalized acute severe ulcerative colitis patients were enrolled for a prospective cohort study between 2009 and 2017. Sixty-five patients received intravenous tacrolimus and 22 received oral tacrolimus. The primary outcome was the achievement of clinical remission within 2 weeks. Relapse and colectomy incidence and adverse events were assessed at 24 weeks. Results Response rates of both treatments exceeded 50% but were not significantly different. The remission rate was higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. At 24 weeks, oral and intravenous tacrolimus showed similar relapse-free survival rates; however, colectomy-free survival rates were higher in intravenous tacrolimus compared with oral tacrolimus. Conclusions Patients receiving intravenous tacrolimus achieved superior remission and colectomy-free survival rates compared with patients receiving oral tacrolimus. Safety was similar between the two treatments.

Keywords