PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

The impact of university STEM assets: A systematic review of the empirical evidence.

  • Chloe Billing,
  • George Bramley,
  • Carolin Ioramashvili,
  • Robert Lynam,
  • Magda Cepeda Zorrilla,
  • Simon Collinson,
  • Kelvin Humphreys,
  • Konstantinos Kollydas,
  • Fengjie Pan,
  • Alice Pugh,
  • Deniz Sevinc,
  • Pei-Yu Yuan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287005
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 6
p. e0287005

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundInnovation ecosystems are an important driver of regional economic growth and development. STEM assets connected to universities may play an important role in such ecosystems.ObjectiveTo systematically review the literature relating to the effect of university STEM assets on regional economies and innovation ecosystems, providing a better understanding of how the impact is generated and constrained, as well as identifying any gaps in knowledge.MethodsKeyword and text word searches using the Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), Econlit (EBSCO) and ERIC (EBSCO) were performed in July 2021 and February 2023. Papers were double screened on abstract and title, and were included if there was consensus that they fulfilled the inclusion criteria of: (i) relating to an OECD country; (ii) having been published between 1 January 2010 and 28 February 2023; and (iii) concerning the impact of STEM assets. Data extraction was undertaken for each article by a single reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Due to the heterogeneity of the study designs and outcome measures used, it was not possible to perform a quantitative synthesis of results. A narrative synthesis was subsequently undertaken.ResultsOf the 162 articles identified for detailed review, 34 were accepted as being sufficiently relevant to the study to be included for final analysis. Three important features identified were that the literature: i) is predominately concerned with supporting new businesses; ii) describes a high level of involvement with a university in providing that support; and iii studies economic impacts at local, regional and national levels.DiscussionThe evidence points to a gap in the literature relating to looking at the broader impact of STEM assets and any corresponding transformational, system-level effects that go beyond narrowly defined, short to medium-term outcomes. The main limitation of this review is that information on STEM assets in the non-academic literature is not captured.