Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams (Feb 2014)

Magnetic property of a staggered-array undulator using a bulk high-temperature superconductor

  • Ryota Kinjo,
  • Kenta Mishima,
  • Yong-Woon Choi,
  • Mohamed Omer,
  • Kyohei Yoshida,
  • Hani Negm,
  • Konstantin Torgasin,
  • Marie Shibata,
  • Kyohei Shimahashi,
  • Hidekazu Imon,
  • Kensuke Okumura,
  • Motoharu Inukai,
  • Heishun Zen,
  • Toshiteru Kii,
  • Kai Masuda,
  • Kazunobu Nagasaki,
  • Hideaki Ohgaki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.17.022401
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 2
p. 022401

Abstract

Read online Read online

The magnetic field of a staggered-array undulator using a bulk high-temperature superconductor is calculated by analytical and numerical methods. Analytical formulas for the undulator field and the solenoid field required to generate the undulator field are derived from a simple two-dimensional model. The analytical calculation shows the degree of dependence of these fields on the undulator parameters, the generation of a high undulator field proportional to the critical current density of the bulk superconductor, and the good tunability of the undulator field over a wide range of values. The numerical calculation is performed in a three-dimensional geometry by two methods: the center field and energy minimization methods. The latter treats the current distribution inside the bulk, whereas the former neglects it as a natural extension of the analytical model. The calculation also reveals the dependence of the fields on the undulator parameters arising from the current distribution. From the comparison with experimental results, we find that the latter method reproduces the experimental results well, which indicates the importance of the current distribution inside the bulk. Therefore, we derive a semiempirical formula for the required solenoid field by modifying the analytical formula using the numerical results so as to include the effect of the current distribution. The semiempirical formula reproduces the numerical result with an error of 3%. Finally, we estimate the magnetic performance of the undulator as an example of using the formulas and values presented in this paper. The estimation shows that an undulator field twice as large as that of the present in-vacuum undulator but with an equal period and gap can be obtained at a temperature of approximately 20–40 K, and that deflection parameters (K values) of 1 and 2 can be achieved with periods of 5 and 10 mm at approximately 4–20 K.