Petroleum Research (Jun 2024)

Identification of carbonate sedimentary facies from well logs with machine learning

  • Xianmu Hou,
  • Peiqing Lian,
  • Jiuyu Zhao,
  • Yun Zai,
  • Weiyao Zhu,
  • Fuyong Wang

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 2
pp. 165 – 175

Abstract

Read online

Sedimentary facies identification is critical for carbonate oil and gas reservoir development. The traditional method of sedimentary facies identification not only be affected by the engineer's experience but also takes a long time. Identifying carbonate sedimentary facies based on machine learning is the trend of future development and has the advantages of short time consuming and reliable results without engineers' subjective influence. Although many references reported the application of machine learning to identify lithofacies, but identifying sedimentary facies of carbonate reservoirs is much more challenging due to the complex sedimentary environment and tectonic movement. This paper compares the performance of the carbonate sedimentary facies identification using four different machine learning models, and the optimal machine learning with the highest prediction accuracy is recommended. First, the carbonate sedimentary facies are classified into the lagoon, shallow sea, shoal, fore-shoal, and inter-shoal five tags based on the well loggings. Then, five well log curves including spectral gamma ray (SGR), uranium-free gamma ray (CGR), photoelectric absorption cross-section index (PE), true formation resistivity (RT), shallow lateral resistivity (RS) are used as the input, and the manual identified carbonate sedimentary facies are used as the output of the machine learning model. The performance of four different machine learning algorithms, including support vector machine (SVM), deep neural network (DNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) network, and random forest (RF) are compared. The other two wells are used for model validation. The research results show that the RF method has the highest accuracy of sedimentary facies prediction, and the average prediction accuracy is 78.81%; the average accuracy of sedimentary facies prediction using SVM is 77.93%. The sedimentary facies predictions using DNN and LSTM are less satisfying compared with RF and SVM, and the average accuracy is 69.94% and 73.05%, respectively. The predicted carbonate sedimentary facies by LSTM are more continuous compared with other machine learning models. This study is helpful for identifying compelx sedimentary facies of carbonate reservoirs from well logs.

Keywords