PLoS ONE (Jan 2018)

Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study.

  • Ambra Mara Giovannetti,
  • Claudia Borreani,
  • Elisabetta Bianchi,
  • Andrea Giordano,
  • Sabina Cilia,
  • Susanna Cipollari,
  • Ilaria Rossi,
  • Claudia Cavallaro,
  • Valentina Torri Clerici,
  • Edoardo Rossetti,
  • Maria Consiglia Stefanelli,
  • Amadio Totis,
  • Angelo Pappalardo,
  • Gina Occhipinti,
  • Paolo Confalonieri,
  • Simone Veronese,
  • Maria Grazia Grasso,
  • Francesco Patti,
  • Paola Zaratin,
  • Mario Alberto Battaglia,
  • Alessandra Solari,
  • PeNSAMI project

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200532
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 7
p. e0200532

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND:We performed a qualitative study to investigate the experiences of participants in a multicentre randomized controlled trial on a home-based palliative approach (HPA) for adults with severe multiple sclerosis (MS) and their caregivers. Our aim was to explore the strengths and challenges of the intervention, and circumstances that may have influenced its efficacy. METHODS:Participants to the qualitative study were the patients, their caregivers, patient referring physicians, and the teams who delivered the HPA intervention. We performed semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 patients and 15 informal caregivers chosen using a maximum variation strategy, two focus group meetings with patient referring physicians (4 participants each), and one with the HPA teams (9 participants). RESULTS:From data analysis (framework method) 38 sub-categories emerged, which were grouped into 10 categories and 3 themes: 'expectations,' 'met and unmet needs', and 'barriers'. Intervention benefits were improved control of symptoms and reduced sense of isolation of the patient-caregiver dyads. Limitations were: factors related to experimental design (difficulty of dyads in identifying examiner and team roles, additional burden for caregivers); team issues (insufficient team building /supervision, competing priorities); limitations of the intervention itself (insufficient length, lack of rehabilitation input); and external factors (resource limitations, under-responsive services/professionals). The referring physician focus groups provided little experiential data. CONCLUSIONS:The HPA reduced patient symptoms and sense of isolation in patients and caregivers. The indirect role of the HPA teams, and insufficient length of the intervention were key limitations. The experimental design imposed additional burdens on the dyads. Key barriers were the paucity of available services, the demanding administrative procedures, and lack of networking facilities. These findings suggest that two major requirements are necessary for home palliative care to be effective in this patient population: HPA teams well-connected with MS rehabilitation services, and care delivered over the long-term, with variable intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN73082124 (Registered 19/06/2014).