Frontiers in Sustainability (Mar 2023)

Barriers and enablers of 1.5° lifestyles: Shallow and deep structural factors shaping the potential for sustainable consumption

  • Steffen Hirth,
  • Steffen Hirth,
  • Halliki Kreinin,
  • Doris Fuchs,
  • Nils Blossey,
  • Pia Mamut,
  • Jeremy Philipp,
  • Isabelle Radovan,
  • The EU1.5°Lifestyles Consortium,
  • Orsolya Antal,
  • Inga Belousa,
  • Martha Bösch,
  • Janis Brizga,
  • Gaston Bronstering,
  • Adina Dumitru,
  • Shari Langner,
  • Karlis Laksevics,
  • Carola Leutermann,
  • Charlotte Klosterberg,
  • Neele Kramer,
  • Vanessa Mato-Santiso,
  • Oksana Mont,
  • Nadin Ozcelik,
  • Andrius Plepys,
  • Marta Rey-García,
  • Jessika Richter,
  • Laura Scherer,
  • Katharina Stauffenberg,
  • Anita Szollossy,
  • Edina Vadovics,
  • Kristóf Vadovics,
  • Linda Zsemberovszky

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1014662
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionTransforming consumption and lifestyles toward sustainability cannot be achieved by individual behavior change alone but requires changes in the structures in which this behavior is embedded. However, “structure” is a blurry concept and scholars use it in a multitude of ways. What often remains implicit in studies on structural phenomena are different types of structures, how they may or may not restrict the agency of individuals in particular ways, and how these restrictions support sustainable consumption patterns at the societal level. To move beyond the current state of research, this article systematizes political, economic, technological, and societal structural factors the literature identifies as impactful regarding the sustainability of consumption and lifestyles compatible with the targets of the Paris Agreement.MethodsWe draw on a systematic review of existing research and use empirical observations to develop conceptual terms that revisit the structure-agency dilemma and offer ways going forward about (un)sustainable consumption.ResultsWe do so based on the material or ideational, as well as shallow or deep nature of these factors. Thereby, the article throws light on the deep and opaque material and ideational structural factors lying underneath and shaping the sustainability impact of the more visible, shallow structural factors typically considered in public debates about sustainability governance.DiscussionThe article, thus, highlights the need to consider and address these deep structural factors for any effective pursuit of transformation.

Keywords