L’attitude, puis les arguments

Abstract

The paper investigates the challenges posed by argumentation relying on a logical fallacy. The data has been obtained from a genuine interaction found in cyberspace. The aim of the study is to demonstrate that once a line of reasoning is arbitrarily imposed, a conversational schema emerges, even in spite of the fact that the messages are not consistently interlinked

Keywords

• cyberspace
• logical fallacy
• argumentative subversiveness
• false causation