Frontiers in Language Sciences (Dec 2024)
From formalism to intuition: probing the role of the trochee in German nominal plural forms in L1 and L2 German speakers
Abstract
Accounting for plural formation in Standard German (SG) nominals has proven to be a challenging endeavor. Numerous formalisms and models have been proposed and intensely debated over the past decades. The fundamental difficulty lies in the fact that German has a large number of suffix allomorphs, some of which can be used with or without stem-vowel fronting/raising (umlaut). Current research suggests that, at the segmental level, it is impossible to fully predict how plurality will be marked for a given singular form. At the suprasegmental level, however, the vast majority of German plurals, except plurals ending in <-s> /-s/, exhibit a specific prosodic shape word-finally: a strong-weak pattern, i.e., a sequence of a stressed syllable followed by an unstressed syllable. In other words, German plurals tend to end in a disyllabic trochee. Previous experimental investigations have sought to provide empirical evidence in favor of various formal models. To date, these experimental studies have focused primarily on the segmental composition of plural suffixes. It remains untested—and thus largely unknown—whether the prosodic pattern at the interface between morphology and phonology is an active, productive part of the grammar of first language (L1) and second language (L2) users of German across proficiency levels. We therefore set out to test whether users actively apply the trochaic principle in the production and comprehension of German plural nouns. To this end, we tested L1 German and L1 English-L2 German users across four proficiency levels on a non-word plural elicitation task, in which they produced plural forms for non-words, akin to a wug-test; L2 users additionally completed a plural elicitation task with existing German nouns. All users then participated in a grammatical acceptability judgment task, in which they rated German nouns with various incorrect and correct (i.e., SG) plural forms on a Likert scale. L2 learners produced more trochaic plural forms as proficiency increased, and more advanced users showed a stronger correlation between their ratings and plural forms depending on the forms' correctness and prosody. We further analyzed how prosodic patterns varied with morphological context across proficiency levels, before discussing how the data can be accounted for within various models of German plurals.
Keywords
