Arthritis Research & Therapy (Jun 2024)

Effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors in relapsing giant cell arteritis in real-world clinical practice and review of the literature

  • Javier Loricera,
  • Toluwalase Tofade,
  • Diana Prieto-Peña,
  • Susana Romero-Yuste,
  • Eugenio de Miguel,
  • Anne Riveros-Frutos,
  • Iván Ferraz-Amaro,
  • Eztizen Labrador,
  • Olga Maiz,
  • Elena Becerra,
  • Javier Narváez,
  • Eva Galíndez-Agirregoikoa,
  • Ismael González-Fernández,
  • Ana Urruticoechea-Arana,
  • Ángel Ramos-Calvo,
  • Fernando López-Gutiérrez,
  • Santos Castañeda,
  • Sebastian Unizony,
  • Ricardo Blanco

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03314-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background A substantial proportion of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) relapse despite standard therapy with glucocorticoids, methotrexate and tocilizumab. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of GCA and JAK inhibitors (JAKi) could be a therapeutic alternative. We evaluated the effectiveness of JAKi in relapsing GCA patients in a real-world setting and reviewed available literature. Methods Retrospective analysis of GCA patients treated with JAKi for relapsing disease at thirteen centers in Spain and one center in United States (01/2017-12/2022). Outcomes assessed included clinical remission, complete remission and safety. Clinical remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms regardless of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values. Complete remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms along with normal ESR and CRP values. A systematic literature search for other JAKi-treated GCA cases was conducted. Results Thirty-five patients (86% females, mean age 72.3) with relapsing GCA received JAKi therapy (baricitinib, n = 15; tofacitinib, n = 10; upadacitinib, n = 10). Before JAKi therapy, 22 (63%) patients had received conventional synthetic immunosuppressants (e.g., methotrexate), and 30 (86%) biologics (e.g., tocilizumab). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 11 (6-15.5) months, 20 (57%) patients achieved and maintained clinical remission, 16 (46%) patients achieved and maintained complete remission, and 15 (43%) patients discontinued the initial JAKi due to relapse (n = 11 [31%]) or serious adverse events (n = 4 [11%]). A literature search identified another 36 JAKi-treated GCA cases with clinical improvement reported for the majority of them. Conclusions This real-world analysis and literature review suggest that JAKi could be effective in GCA, including in patients failing established glucocorticoid-sparing therapies such as tocilizumab and methotrexate. A phase III randomized controlled trial of upadacitinib is currently ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03725202).

Keywords