iScience (Oct 2023)

Direct comparison reveals algorithmic similarities in fly and mouse visual motion detection

  • Juyue Chen,
  • Caitlin M. Gish,
  • James W. Fransen,
  • Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas,
  • Damon A. Clark,
  • Bart G. Borghuis

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. 10
p. 107928

Abstract

Read online

Summary: Evolution has equipped vertebrates and invertebrates with neural circuits that selectively encode visual motion. While similarities in the computations performed by these circuits in mouse and fruit fly have been noted, direct experimental comparisons have been lacking. Because molecular mechanisms and neuronal morphology in the two species are distinct, we directly compared motion encoding in these two species at the algorithmic level, using matched stimuli and focusing on a pair of analogous neurons, the mouse ON starburst amacrine cell (ON SAC) and Drosophila T4 neurons. We find that the cells share similar spatiotemporal receptive field structures, sensitivity to spatiotemporal correlations, and tuning to sinusoidal drifting gratings, but differ in their responses to apparent motion stimuli. Both neuron types showed a response to summed sinusoids that deviates from models for motion processing in these cells, underscoring the similarities in their processing and identifying response features that remain to be explained.

Keywords