Comparison of Three Approaches for Estimating Understory Biomass in Yanshan Mountains

Abstract

Aboveground biomass (AGB) of shrubs and low-statured trees constitutes a substantial portion of the total carbon pool in temperate forest ecosystems, contributing much to local biodiversity, altering tree-regeneration growth rates, and determining above- and belowground food webs. Accurate quantification of AGB at the shrub layer is crucial for ecological modeling and still remains a challenge. Several methods for estimating understory biomass, including inventory and remote sensing-based methods, need to be evaluated against measured datasets. In this study, we acquired 158 individual terrestrial laser scans (TLS) across 45 sites in the Yanshan Mountains and generated metrics including leaf area and stem volume from TLS data using voxel- and non-voxel-based approaches in both leaf-on and leaf-off scenarios. Allometric equations were applied using field-measured parameters as an inventory approach. The results indicated that allometric equations using crown area and height yielded results with higher accuracy than other inventory approach parameters (R2 and RMSE ranging from 0.47 to 0.91 and 12.38 to 38.11 g, respectively). The voxel-based approach using TLS data provided results with R2 and RMSE ranging from 0.86 to 0.96 and 6.43 to 21.03 g. Additionally, the non-voxel-based approach provided similar or slightly better results compared to the voxel-based approach (R2 and RMSE ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 and 4.23 to 11.27 g, respectively) while avoiding the complexity of selecting the optimal voxel size that arises during voxelization.

Keywords

• understory AGB estimation
• TLS
• voxel size
• non-voxel-based approach