GERB Obs4MIPs: a dataset for evaluating diurnal and monthly variations in top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes in climate models

Abstract

A newly available radiative flux dataset specifically designed to enable the evaluation of the diurnal cycle in top-of-atmosphere (TOA) fluxes as captured by climate and Earth system models is presented. Observations over the period 2007–2012 made by the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) instrument are used to derive monthly hourly mean outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) and reflected shortwave (RSW) fluxes on a regular 1° latitude–longitude grid covering approximately 60° N–60° S and 60° E–60° W. The impact of missing data is evaluated in detail, and a data-filling solution is implemented using estimates of broadband fluxes from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager flying on the same Meteosat platform, scaled to the GERB observations. This relatively simple approach is shown to deliver an approximate improvement by a factor of 10 in both the bias caused by missing data and the associated variability in the error. To demonstrate the utility of this V1.1 filled GERB Observations for Climate Model Intercomparison Projects (Obs4MIPs) dataset, comparisons are made to radiative fluxes from two climate configurations of the Hadley Centre's Global Environmental Model: HadGEM3-GC3.1 and HadGEM3-GC5.0. Focusing on marine stratocumulus and deep convective cloud regimes, diurnally resolved comparisons between the models and observations highlight discrepancies between the model configurations in terms of their ability to capture the diurnal amplitude and the phase in TOA fluxes, details that cannot be diagnosed by comparisons at lower temporal resolutions. For these cloud regimes the GC5.0 configuration shows improved fidelity to the observations relative to GC3.1, although notable differences remain. The V1.1 filled GERB Obs4MIPs monthly hourly TOA fluxes are available from the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, with the OLR fluxes accessible at https://doi.org/10.5285/90148d9b1f1c40f1ac40152957e25467 (Bantges et al., 2023a) and the RSW fluxes accessible at https://doi.org/10.5285/57821b58804945deaf4cdde278563ec2 (Bantges et al., 2023b).