Gender inequity in individual participation within physics and science, technology, engineering, and math courses

Abstract

Gender inequities continue to persist within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, even at the undergraduate level. This has led researchers to further examine potential factors that contribute to retention and persistence of undergraduates in STEM fields. In this study using classroom observations, we examined gender equity in individual verbal participation in large introductory physics courses, and compared our results to observations in introductory courses in other STEM disciplines. We found that in introductory physics courses, men had disproportionately higher rates of individual verbal participation than women. Observation-level analysis confirmed that three-quarters (76.2%) of the physics observations had descriptively higher than expected participation by men and almost a quarter of observations (23.8%) were statistically significant for a gender imbalance in individual verbal participation. We then sought to determine if any pedagogical strategies or student behaviors correlated with a more equitable classroom to better understand what drives gender inequity in participation, and found three classroom behaviors—an increasing amount of instructor questions, group responses from students, and student questions—correspond with a more gender equitable classroom. Student-level survey data, which mirrors the observation data, also show that self-reported levels of individual participation have small, significant correlations with both course-level belonging and inclusivity. The introductory physics results were mostly replicated in the other STEM disciplines, despite their differences in course structure. The patterns of individual participation were still disproportionately higher for men, with two-thirds of observations displaying a bias towards more men participating. Student-level survey data continued to mirror the observation data, and small, significant correlations between student self-reported participation and course-level belonging and inclusion were found. However, only the number of student questions correlated with a more equitable classroom in other STEM courses. This study extends the conversation on the relationship between active learning and equity in the classroom, demonstrating a need to move beyond mere inclusion of active pedagogies towards proactive facilitation of equitable and comfortable verbal participation by all students. Practical strategies for encouraging inclusive classroom dialogue, such as transparency, growth-mindset messaging, and multiple modes of engagement, are discussed.