Laparoscopic pectopexy for patients with intraabdominal adhesions, lumbar spinal procedures, and other contraindications to sacrocolpopexy: a case series

Abstract

Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy utilizing fixation points in the anterior pelvis for vaginal vault suspension; it was originally developed for an obese population. This is a retrospective case series of 7 women who underwent laparoscopic pectopexy at one academic Institution between October 2019 and December 2020. The patients had preoperative vaginal vault prolapse (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system [POP-Q], stage 2 and 3). Pectopexy was performed because of relative contraindications to sacrocolpopexy, including use of antiplatelet therapy, extensive adhesions, and chronic back pain with lumbo-spinal fusion. No intraoperative complications were documented in this cohort. Average blood loss was 32.9 mL. All the patients were discharged home within 24 hours. One patient experienced urinary retention that required release of the retropubic midurethral sling placed at the time of pectopexy. The most recent follow-up examination occurred at an average of 127 days after the procedure. All 7 patients had a resolution of their prolapse (POP-Q ≤1). This case series highlights the application of pectopexy for patients with extensive adhesions, use of antiplatelet therapy and lumbar or sacral spinal surgical history. The complication rates and operative results are comparable with sacrocolpopexy at intermediate-term follow-up in this small case series, indicating that pectopexy may be a promising alternative for patients with relative contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. This is the first report of the application of the technique in North America.

Keywords

• contraindications
• laparoscopic pectopexy
• laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
• spinal surgery