Nature Communications (Nov 2024)

Contributions of ecological restoration policies to China’s land carbon balance

  • Chao Yue,
  • Mengyang Xu,
  • Philippe Ciais,
  • Shu Tao,
  • Huizhong Shen,
  • Jinfeng Chang,
  • Wei Li,
  • Lei Deng,
  • Junhao He,
  • Yi Leng,
  • Yu Li,
  • Jiaming Wang,
  • Can Xu,
  • Han Zhang,
  • Pengyi Zhang,
  • Liankai Zhang,
  • Jie Zhao,
  • Lei Zhu,
  • Shilong Piao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54100-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Unleashing the land sector’s potential for climate mitigation requires purpose-driven changes in land management. However, contributions of past management changes to the current global and regional carbon cycles remain unclear. Here, we use vegetation modelling to reveal how a portfolio of ecological restoration policies has impacted China’s terrestrial carbon balance through developing counterfactual ‘no-policy’ scenarios. Pursuing conventional policies and assuming no changes in climate or atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) since 1980 would have led China’s land sector to be a carbon source of 0.11 Pg C yr−1 for 2001–2020, in stark contrast to a sink of 175.9 Tg C yr−1 in reality. About 72.7% of this difference can be attributed to land management changes, including afforestation and reforestation (49.0%), reduced wood extraction (21.8%), fire prevention and suppression (1.6%) and grassland grazing exclusion (0.3%). The remaining 27.3% come from changes in atmospheric CO2 (42.2%) and climate (−14.9%). Our results underscore the potential of active land management in achieving ‘carbon-neutrality’ in China.